A Man For All Seasons :: essays research papers

A "Man for any Seasons" is about a humanity so subtle and saintly that an prole who takes on the role must be able to project an about superhuman presence. As is evident, the story is based on the life of Sir doubting Thomas More, man of God and chancellor to the court of Henry VIII. The year is 1530 and from what I know, actors in this movie typically wear transparent half-masks and double up on roles.More was the only member of Henry VIIIs government who would not be seduced or corrupted by Henrys threats. When the king asked More to support an oath establishing the monarchy as head of the Church of England, More refused. He could not alter the law, he said. As the play progresses and More loses his wealth and crimson his freedom, he becomes almost self-righteous in his strict adherence to the law. Exasperating, notwithstanding he must remain sympathetic as his family goes down with him into heartbreak and poverty. The man who plays him must show both his affectiona te disposition and his level piety or the script would be just an exercise in mouthing lines.What I saw from the story was how the wheels turn in Mores mind, the glowof heating plant and the bleakness of despair that flicker across his face. It is not enough to rouge him as a man. He must be a man among grovelers and syncophants, a towering presence. A man for all seasons, in new(prenominal) words.In most cases, I am compelled to say that one in all probability would not be able to successfully preserve their integrity in a situation such as Thomas Mores. But in rejoinder to the question of whether or not a man offer middling hope to do so, I believe that Mores behavioral response exemplifies a positive confirmation of such.Even if it could not be reasonably expected for a man to maintain his integrity when consistently confront with such a dilemma, it would belike be asserted that such was understandable. somewhat indirectly, this case reminds me of Aristotelian and Platon ic discussions of virtue and the nature of man. Some philosophers would probably insist that man