Boer Guerrilla Fighters Essay

I agree that the elbow room the British soldiers handle the Boer fighters and civilians was in fact fell. With the use of the institutione rings and the adust orb form _or_ system of government it made them count that much more brutal. Sources P, Q and R totally offer different insights into how brutally British soldier dealt with the Boer guerrilla fighters during the Second Boer warfare in 1899, with recount to hold the barbarity of it all. Source R strongly agrees that the British treated the Boers badly, particularly the women and children, with this being utter the arising also has elements of disagreements. At a first glance source Q seems to disagree only when that disagreement is later(prenominal) challenged deep tear down the source. Source P takes an agreeing approach to the statement. From the sources it appears that the way the British dealt with the Boers was brutally, but how brutal were they when nerve-racking to defeat the Boers guerrilla fighters is debatable.There is evidence in source Q and elements of source R would support the fact that the British soldier didnt treat the Boers brutally. Source Q explains that The slope did burn down farm houses, but never shot the people at bottom them and Of course, brutal interposition did occur, but in general the Boer prisoners were treated with wish. This links in with a certain part of source R where it ways The high death post was the result of incompetency and lack of foreboding on the part of the British phalanx authorities. The heat up earth policy was brought in by Kitchener, it involved British soldiers passage into the Boer farm houses, evacuating them and thence burning them down. By burning the houses down Boer men couldnt use their farm houses as a way of hiding from the British and the women couldnt resupply their men during the guerrilla warfare. The policy itself isnt considered to be a brutal manoeuvre as it wasnt killing or harming anyone if killings we re taking place then this would obligate made it brutal.The none-brutality of this tactic suggests the British were non brutal when dealing with the Boers and they treated (them) with respect. The women and children were then transferred into the British refugee camps. Originally the immersion camps had been set up by the British army as refugee camps to provide refuge for civilian families, mainly woman and children, who had been pressure to abandon their homes primarily due to the adust earth policy. These concentration camps started as refugee camps, and then turned into come inside prisons until finally things got out of hand and became concentration camps. The quote from source R shows that the progression of refugee to concentration camps wasnt the original plan of action for the British but due to disorganisation and incompetence the standards and quality of the refugee camps fell. Both sources give ample evidence to support the fact the British soldiers werent Brutal with their dealings with the Boers as one of the tactics werent brutal and the concentration camps werent intentional.Sources P and R both show evidence to support the idea that the British were brutal with their treatment of the Boar population. Source P says slightly of our work was unpleasant. If we tack any gird or ammunition concealed on a farm we had to burn down the place. Source R really highlights the brutality and reality of warfare. The treatment of the Boer population in the camps was brutal and Over 20,000 Boer women and children died in 40 camps, about one in 4 of the inmates. It was the soldiers who had to do the process of the scorched earth policy, they were poseed to destruct the farms and the homes of civilians in order to prevent the still-fighting Boers from obtaining food and supplies. The intention of the British government was the complete eradication of the Boer nations.From 1899 1901, the British destroyed 40 towns and burned crops. The bear on of t he British scorched earth policy during the war killed both half of the Boer Nations. During January 1901 Emily Hobhouse arrived at a camp in Bloemfontein where she found diseases such as measles, bronchitis, pneumonia, dysentery and typhoid had invaded the camp with fatal results. The very few tents were not enough to house the one or more sick persons, most of them children. When she put across soap for the people, she was told that soap is an article of luxury. She later succeeded, after a struggle, to have it listed as a necessity, together with straw, more tents and more kettles in which to boil the drinking water.She distributed raiment and supplied pregnant women, who had to sleep on the ground, with mattresses. Among the some(prenominal) dying people there was a child called Lizzie von Zyl, Hobhouse used her death as an example of the hardships the Boer women and children faced in the British concentration camps during the war. Both of the sources show the difficulties th e Boer population had to face during the Second Boer War as a result of the brutality from the British. Without the scorched earth policy the concentration camps may not have risen to the cessation and disaster which was witnessed by Emily Hobhouse on her pilgrimage to Bloemfontein.